Carry On Review: A Detailed and Honest Look Into Netflix’s Thriller of 2024

Introduction

If you’re a fan of action-packed thrillers with unexpected twists, “Carry On” might have already caught your attention. Netflix’s 2024 release combines suspense, high-stakes drama, and a talented cast to bring a gripping story set in the unpredictable environment of an airport. But does the film soar to great heights or crash under the weight of its limitations? In this article, I will dive into reviews from various movie lovers, analyze their perspectives, and offer you a comprehensive guide on whether “Carry On Review” deserves a spot on your watchlist. Buckle up, because this review takes you through the highs and lows of “Carry On” with clarity and honesty. (Spoiler Alert!)

What Makes “Carry On” Stand Out: The Positives

An Unexpected Thriller That Keeps You Guessing

Many viewers have praised how “Carry On” delivers suspense and tension in almost every scene. From the moment Ethan (played by Taron Egerton) picks up that fateful earpiece, the movie dives headfirst into an adrenaline-filled narrative. Several reviews pointed out its unpredictable twists, with one audience member stating:

“This movie is so suspenseful and unpredictable! I was shaking halfway through!”

This speaks volumes about the movie’s ability to grip its audience and keep them invested.

A Unique Setting That Builds Suspense

The single-location approach of setting the entire movie within an airport has garnered admiration for its creativity. Unlike conventional all-over-the-city thrillers, “Carry On” used an airport’s high surveillance and controlled atmosphere to heighten the tension. The confined setting adds to the protagonists’ feelings of entrapment, as pointed out by many, like this viewer:

“The airport setting made everything more intense and claustrophobic. It felt like there was no place to escape.”

By focusing on a high-pressure environment, the movie successfully brings a fresh vibe to the genre, much like “Die Hard” meets “Mission: Impossible.”

Stellar Performances From the Cast

Taron Egerton’s portrayal of Ethan, an ordinary airport security officer dragged into a dangerous conspiracy, stands out as one of the film’s highlights. His performance captures desperation, fear, and determination, making him a relatable character for audiences. One reviewer gushed:

“Taron Egerton is absolutely phenomenal. You can totally feel his panic!”

Similarly, Jason Bateman impressed viewers with his transformation into a menacing, manipulative villain. Known mostly for comedic or lighthearted roles, Bateman’s portrayal of Alcott—the ruthless antagonist—shocked audiences in the best way. A fan remarked:

“Jason Bateman as a villain is terrifying! He plays his role so perfectly, it’s chilling.”

Action and Stunts That Keep You on the Edge

With smart choreography, gripping fight scenes, and high-octane action sequences, “Carry On” doesn’t disappoint those craving an adrenaline rush. A standout moment, as mentioned by one fan, is the fight between LAPD Detective Elena Cole (Danielle Deadwyler) and Alcott (Jason Bateman):

“The fight choreography is top-notch, especially the scene between Danielle and Bateman. It was intense!”

Another memorable sequence involves a fight in a moving car that left audiences breathless. These well-orchestrated moments provide the necessary thrills and excitement expected of a thriller.

Carry On: A Thrilling New Addition to Holiday Action Movies

The Flaws of “Carry On”: Where It Stumbles

Plot Holes and Illogical Scenes

Despite its gripping narrative, “Carry On” is not without its flaws, and several viewers pointed out glaring plot holes and unrealistic scenarios. One common grievance was how the movie ignored basic realism, particularly in an airport setting. A review highlighted:

“The airport is one of the most monitored places, and yet people are running around with weapons, and nobody notices? It makes no sense!”

Another viewer found the lack of cybersecurity measures at the airport implausible:

“A key character hacked into the system and remained undetected for ages. In an actual airport, this wouldn’t fly.”

These oversights frustrated audiences and pulled them out of the immersive experience the movie intended to create.

Uneven Pacing and Repetitive Monologues

Pacing is crucial in thrillers, but some viewers felt “Carry On” dragged in certain parts. Prolonged monologues and overly drawn-out scenes diluted the movie’s suspense. One viewer humorously remarked:

“The villain keeps talking about how he’s in control for what feels like forever. My ears were bleeding!”

While tension-building dialogue can enhance a story, overusing it can wear down audience engagement—a pitfall this movie occasionally fell into.

Predictability and Lack of Depth

While some found the twists unpredictable, others criticized the story for being formulaic and overly reliant on clichés. Several reviews mentioned how they could guess the ending halfway through, which lessens the excitement of watching a thriller. One audience member summarized:

“By the midpoint, I could pretty much guess how it would end. It’s like they followed a checklist for thrillers.”

Moreover, the limited development of secondary characters disappointed some viewers, as their importance to the plot seemed undervalued.

A Divided Audience: Highlights From Mixed Reviews

Some Love It, Some Don’t

“Carry On’s” reviews spark stark polarities among its viewers. While some believed it to be one of Netflix’s best efforts, others felt it fell flat despite its potential. For instance, one enthusiastic reviewer raved:

“This movie is spectacular! I’ve never written a review before, but I had to for this!”

In contrast, less impressed viewers felt its execution didn’t live up to the promise of its premise, producing scathing feedback like:

“Carry On had potential, but it’s frustrating because the execution is chaotic and full of wasted opportunities.”

The Cinematic Balance: What Works and What Doesn’t

Strengths:

• Dynamic performances: Taron Egerton and Jason Bateman elevate the film.
• High tension: The confined setting and explosive action sequences create a captivating atmosphere.
• Relatability: The protagonist’s ordinary background makes him more relatable to audiences.

Weaknesses:

• Illogical choices: Plot holes and unrealistic scenarios disrupt immersion.
• Overused tropes: Predictable twists and clichés stifle originality.
• Uneven pace: Some scenes drag too long, reducing overall tension.

Final Verdict: Is “Carry On” Worth Watching?

“Carry On” is undeniably entertaining and delivers thrilling moments that will keep action lovers satisfied. Its performances—particularly by Taron Egerton and Jason Bateman—are worth watching. However, it’s important to approach the movie with managed expectations, as its glaring plot holes and lack of realism might annoy more critical viewers.

If you enjoy fast-paced movies that don’t dive too deeply into logic or character development, “Carry On” is a fun watch, especially if you’re hunting for something new during the holidays. However, if a tightly written, well-executed thriller is more your style, this might leave you rolling your eyes instead.

Conclusion: The Final Word on “Carry On”

In the ever-growing world of Netflix releases, “Carry On” offers an action-packed escape fueled by stellar performances and engaging tension. While it doesn’t redefine the thriller genre, it provides enough punch to keep you entertained if you’re willing to suspend disbelief. Watch it for the cast and the intensity, but don’t expect it to break out as a masterpiece.